The Objectivity of Judicial Decisions : A Comparative Analysis of Nine Jurisdictions
New
Book Details
Delivery Location
Delivery fee: Select location
Delivery in 29 days
This book discusses how judges qualify their activities as objective. The data for this project was retrieved from a large sample of cases using Langacker’s methodology. The sample included over a thousand decisions from Brazil, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Romania and the UK. The decisions considered allegations of judicial bias, unfairness, and injustice. Pre-judices are shared cognitive methods that legal practitioners perceive as necessary. The results of the study directly confirm Pierre Legrand’s claims of pre-judices in legal discourse, and as corollary, Jules L. Coleman and Brian Leiter’s idea of modest objectivity in law.
Get The Objectivity of Judicial Decisions by at the best price and quality guaranteed only at Werezi Africa's largest book ecommerce store. The book was published by Peter Lang AG and it has pages.
