Presents a different approach to doctoral program assessment, which is useful for administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of PhDs in US. This study reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes and revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings.
How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph.D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph.D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings.
Get Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs by Charlotte V. Kuh, Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs at the best price and quality guaranteed only at Werezi Africa's largest book ecommerce store. The book was published by National Academies Press and it has 164 pages.
Our digital collection is currently being curated to ensure the best possible reading experience on Werezi. We'll be launching our Ebooks platform shortly.
Your privacy, your choice
Make Werezi work for you
We use essential cookies for your cart and sign-in. With your permission, optional cookies help us understand how Werezi is used and improve your book recommendations.
Essential cookies are always active. Optional analytics stay off unless you choose Allow all.